Local Town Councillor and COGNEWS writer, Alan Thomas shares his views on the impact of the proposed housing development on Froghall Road.
Overview
This article outlines the concerns and objections to the proposed housing development on greenfield sites, emphasising significant risks and challenges related to insufficient sewerage capacity and high flood risk. Developing these areas would lead to unsustainable environmental, social, and economic consequences.
Key Concerns
Insufficient Sewerage Capacity
Overloaded Infrastructure:
The current sewerage system is feeds into the main line that runs though Cheadle Mobberley, Upper and Lower Tean and on to the processing plant at Checkley, the suggestion is that it is inadequate to support the increased load from the proposed developments currently being carried out and the proposed developments
We are seeing frequent blockages, overflows, and contamination of local waterways, River Tean.
Public Health Risks:
Inadequate sewerage management will ultimately, there have result in untreated sewage discharges, increasing the risk of waterborne diseases for the local population.
Financial Burden;
Expensive upgrades to the sewerage system would be required, which could strain public resources or lead to increased costs for residents.
2. High Risk of Flooding
Greenfield Vulnerability:
Greenfield sites often act as natural floodplains, absorbing excess rainfall. Development on these sites increases surface runoff, raising the risk of flooding in adjacent areas.
3 Climate Change Impacts:
With changing climate patterns, extreme rainfall events are becoming more frequent. Building in flood-prone areas will amplify risks to property and safety.
Insurance and Property Value:
Increased flooding risk will likely result in higher insurance premiums or inability to insure properties. Additionally, properties in flood-prone zones may suffer from depreciated value over time.
4 Environmental Implications
Loss of Biodiversity:
Developing greenfield sites disrupts local ecosystems, endangering wildlife habitats and reducing biodiversity
Increased Carbon Footprint:
Construction and urbanisation on greenfield sites contribute significantly to carbon emissions, contrary to sustainability goals
Water Quality Degradation:
Ineffective management of stormwater and sewage can lead to contamination of rivers, lakes, and groundwater
5 Social and Community Impacts
Community Opposition:
Residents in nearby areas often oppose developments that compromise environmental safety and infrastructure
Loss of Green Spaces:
The destruction of open green spaces negatively affects mental health, recreational opportunities, and community well-being
Recommendations
1. Alternative Locations: Focus on brownfield sites and other areas with existing infrastructure to minimise environmental and infrastructural strain.
2. Infrastructure Investment: Prioritise upgrading sewerage and drainage systems before permitting any development.
3. Comprehensive Flood Risk Assessments: Conduct detailed assessments to avoid building in flood-prone areas and implement sustainable drainage solutions.
4. Community Engagement: Actively involve local communities in planning decisions to ensure developments align with residents’ needs and concerns
In Conclusion
The proposed housing development on greenfield sites poses unacceptable risks due to insufficient sewerage capacity and high flood risks. It is imperative to consider alternative, sustainable options that protect the environment, support public health, and ensure long-term resilience to climate impacts
Alan Thomas
The Importance of Preserving Greenfield Sites in Cheadle: A Call to Action - Last Updated 28.2.25
Comentarios